"Piled on", modern dance. |
Ideas replicate
themselves and compete for survival. Like
animals ideas are evolutionary. Only the
fittest ideas survive. However, fitness
of ideas need not be a guide to truth, fitness is simply the ability to survive
and reproduce. Besides, fitness is
contextual, if everybody in a group shares the same perspectives then their
ideas will survive, in their midst, regardless.
In order to survive ideas need a context, a fertile and suitable context;
or, as we would say in psychology, a compensating context. Compensation is a strategy to hide, cover up or
substitute for what we lack or not do well, by doing something else really
well. The end result is the bubble, the
place inside which our ideas survive and reproduce by making sure out “best”
overshadows our inabilities to survive otherwise. Fitting becomes the exercise of spending
time, emotions, goods, pleasure and profit with people similar to you in
thinking and action.
The Bubble Effect
In a community there are all kinds of social animals, some very fit, some very unfit. Lack of social fitness may be the result of ignorance, culture, language or attitudes. When the social “unfit” get together they compensate, that is, they substitute their inability to fit with everybody with their ability to share experiences with a selected few. They create a ghetto, the place where comfort, survival, reproduction, pleasure AND profit makes life livable in an unfamiliar or threatening space.
In a community there are all kinds of social animals, some very fit, some very unfit. Lack of social fitness may be the result of ignorance, culture, language or attitudes. When the social “unfit” get together they compensate, that is, they substitute their inability to fit with everybody with their ability to share experiences with a selected few. They create a ghetto, the place where comfort, survival, reproduction, pleasure AND profit makes life livable in an unfamiliar or threatening space.
Do you live
in a ghetto?
You may
already know the answer, or you may consider some explorative statements:
1. I only hang out with people I like.
2. I only do what I came here to do (pleasure,
business, or profit, or…)
3. I create spaces where people like me
come to be with me, and do things we all like.
4. I do not truly understand contexts
other than my own.
5. All else outside my context is bad,
or wrong, or unseemly.
6. I do not want anything outside my
bubble, or tolerate very little.
7. I´m critical or hypercritical of
everything else.
8. Nothing moves me away from my reason
for being here (pleasure, business, or profit)
9. If someone or something endangers my
reasons or purpose for being here they are wrong or are dangerous.
10. I need my bubble to continue to
exist as I want it to exist, otherwise I will go.
Astronauts report
that when viewing earth from space, that giant ball of matter hanging from
nowhere, all national borders vanish, all conflicts appear less important and a
pressing need to find a common purpose becomes urgent. Utopia?
Perhaps, but the answer is certainly not the bubble, that “fitting” place
where some find comfort living separated from the rest. Most likely we will never make it to outer
space, but we could explore more of our immediate community in order to
experience the psycho/social impact of our own geographically shared space, not
as a passive, detached, or uninvolved participant, but in the fullness of
citizenship.
Crises
provoke many responses and two, in particular, are extremely powerful. One is the urge to retrench, to go deeper
into the bubble; the other is to seek out and connect. Las Terrenas is at a provocative junction, a
crossroads, caused for a variety of crises—political, economic, social and
cultural—and people who are from here will stay the course as there may be no
other options for them. What´s extremely
interesting to watch is what happens among people who are not from here and can
escape the crises anytime they wish, or have a financial cushion that protects
them, or have guachimanes (security guards) preserving them from the “real”
world. The most common observable
phenomenon among them is one of retrenchment, going deeper into the bubble
while seeing any crisis as threats to their very survival—pleasure, business, or
profit. They don´t pursue community
necessarily, they simply want the status quo, nothing different from what they
perceived was happening when they chose to come here. They might be in need, however, of the “overview
effect”, so that they could be in a privileged position to see this community
the way astronauts see earth from outer space.
Such change of vision might allow them to change ther “immigrant” status
from passive observers to full citizens in the experience of community.
Your
definition is as good as mine, but if you are in your own bubble you are not in
community. As simple as that. All experts sustain the idea that being in
community is not a passive experience, it is an active attitude and place,
involving the wholeness of your being.
If you agree then the question is, are you involved?
Participation
in a community cannot be prescriptive, no one can impose a behavior on you, but
it needs to be the result of making one choice:
partaking. Partaking or social
empathy is answering the question “what do we owe one another as part of the
same community?” If you live in a bubble
chances are you will answer by saying “I don´t owe anyone anything.” If you have experienced the overview effect
you might notice the urgency to do something about our common place of
habitation, sharing in common struggles and pursuing the resolution to crises
that endanger the community. To partake
you must become well-informed, not just from inside of you (your opinions and
ideas), but also from the context driving the crises. Then you might be in a position to make
choices, better choices, those that will prevent you from just pursuing
pleasure, business, or profit, or from seeing yourself strictly in opposition
to the larger community that surrounds you.